Allan Takes Aim Blog

ACT opinions

Posted on: 15 October 2012


Interviews that are not before time

With only five days to go until election day on Saturday, you could have knocked me down with a feather when two early morning radio talk back programs condescended to interview unfashionable candidates from the Ginninderra electorate. Better late than never I suppose.

Of course they can now claim that these too little too late interviews exculpate them from any accusation that their election coverage has been unfair.

They don’t. And if only to add to the unfairness, an academic economist – not a candidate – from Canberra University and consultant to the ACT Government Tax review had said in a Canberra Times opinion piece and repeated on ABC 666 that the Liberals saying rates would triple, misrepresented what the report said.

The fact is that saying something has been misrepresented is an opinion not a lie, even if does not suit the academic who was careful to avoid saying the Liberals were telling lies. On the other hand I wonder what he’d say to Labor and Green supporters who are house owners and small business operator that, on the evidence of their rates notices claim the increases are huge. Are they telling lies?

Sadly however, the election campaign has sunk to a level usually only experienced in less democratic political systems. In this case I am referring to the accusation made by Katy Gallagher that Liberal supporters harassed her using words that imply dangerous behaviour. For both parties such harassment is par for the course during election campaigns although in this case, such allegations seem to have a touch of desperation about them.

Returning to the interviews I learned a couple of things: 1. There seems little difference between Labor and the Greens as Chris Bourke and Meredith Hunter virtually echoed each other; 2. Liberal Candidate Vicki Dunne seemed very positive; 3. Marion Le, Leader of the Social Justice Party, seemed to understand better than the major party candidates what the community wanted; 4. Chic Henry of the Australian Motorist Party would have quelled some voters worries that the AMP was only worried about motoring issues

If these interviews had a wide hearing it’s quite possible they could affect voters’ previous voting intentions.

Advertisements

1 Response to "ACT opinions"

Having read this I believed it was really enlightening.

I appreciate you spending some time and effort to put this informative article together.
I once again find myself spending a lot of time both reading and posting
comments. But so what, it was still worthwhile!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


  • None
  • chilecomex.com: This site was... how do I say it? Relevant!! Finally I've found something that helped me. Thanks a lot!
  • sua tarefa: I blog often and I truly thank you for your content. This article has really peaked my interest. I will bookmark your blog and keep checking for new
  • ZAP Stun Gun: I love it when people come together and share views. Great site, continue the good work!
%d bloggers like this: